Since Broadcom closed the VMware acquisition in late 2023, Australian organisations have been quietly working through the same question: what replaces this? This page is the version of that conversation we'd have with you in a discovery call — vendor-by-vendor, honest about what works and what doesn't, with an Australian operational reality in mind.
Why the question is being asked at all
Three things changed at the same time after the Broadcom acquisition:
- Per-core subscription replaced per-CPU perpetual licensing, with order minimums that hit smaller environments hard.
- The VCSP (VMware Cloud Service Provider) programme was effectively ended for all but a handful of Strategic partners — Australian MSPs and CSPs that built their business on VCSP were the first casualty.
- The product was bundled into VMware Cloud Foundation, meaning organisations pay for vSphere + vSAN + NSX + Aria + VKS (vSphere Kubernetes Service, Broadcom's rename of Tanzu) whether they use them all or not.
For organisations that were happy paying for vSphere alone, the renewal quote is now 2×–4× what they were paying pre-Broadcom — for capability they didn't ask for.
What's actually in the running
Proxmox VE
The most common destination for Australian organisations leaving VMware, and the platform we focus on. Open-source, per-socket licensed (no core counting, no minimums), production-proven across European service providers, government, and enterprise. Native LXC containers, built-in Ceph distributed storage, integrated backup (PBS), and now native Cluster Resource Scheduler in 9.2. See our Proxmox vs VCF feature comparison and the cost calculator.
Nutanix
Mature HCI platform, strong product. Where it doesn't compete with VMware-on-VMware-hardware is on price: Nutanix is in a similar pricing band to VCF, and its commercial model is similarly per-core. Worth considering if you want a fully appliance-backed HCI experience and price isn't the primary driver. See our Proxmox vs Nutanix comparison.
Hyper-V
Microsoft's hypervisor is still relevant — particularly in Australian education and parts of the public sector where the Microsoft enterprise agreement already covers Windows Server Datacenter. If your team's deep operational knowledge is in the Microsoft stack and your Windows Server licensing is sunk, Hyper-V is a credible choice. Where it struggles is heterogeneous environments and Linux-heavy workloads.
OpenStack
Powerful, flexible, and operationally heavyweight. Right answer for organisations that have the platform-engineering bench to operate it (a handful of large Australian telcos and service providers do). Wrong answer for most mid-market organisations — the ongoing operational cost outweighs the licensing savings.
Public cloud (AWS/Azure/GCP) as an alternative
For some workloads, yes. For most VMware estates, no — the workloads sized for on-prem are usually the workloads public cloud is most expensive to host. The conversation about cloud repatriation is happening across Australian organisations for the same reason: predictable on-prem cost beats variable cloud cost for steady-state workloads. See our cloud repatriation page.
How Australian organisations are deciding
The pattern we see across discovery calls is consistent:
- Get a written quote on the upcoming VCF renewal so the actual number is on the table.
- Use a like-for-like cost model on the most-likely alternative (Proxmox in most cases).
- Identify the small number of VCF-specific features that are actually load-bearing (NSX deep microsegmentation, Aria automation, VKS) — for most organisations, this is "none".
- Run an assessment phase against the alternative, document the migration plan, and price the project.
- Decide.
Where Instelligence fits
We're an Australian-based Proxmox VE consultancy and authorised Proxmox reseller. We don't sell VMware, we don't sell Nutanix, and we don't pretend to. What we do is help Australian organisations:
- Cost-model the alternatives honestly, with our calculator and an in-depth assessment.
- Run end-to-end VMware-to-Proxmox migrations — methodically, in phases, with full rollback.
- Operate the resulting environment as a managed service if you'd rather not staff the in-house Linux/Ceph expertise.
Discovery calls are run by senior engineers, take 30–45 minutes, and don't involve a sales rep. Book one here.